Among the innovations introduced by the EMAS Regulation III, point out the obligation imposed on the part of EMAS organizations to pay attention to the issue of BIODIVERSITY ' and therefore the need to measure the area built by the indicator-square meters (m2). This new "measure" requires all EMAS to deep reflections that are no doubt very different depending on the type of organization, as well as its extension.
The biggest impact I think is expected in the government of the territory and therefore in EMS EMAS of public bodies, such as a municipality or a province. In practice, we would have to wait for such environmental requirements are been included in the PRG or Structural Plan or PTCP or other land management tools , to demonstrate what the extent of the territory of what will be built and still available for future generations.
But the new Environmental Statements will bring a new and challenging message?
But the new Environmental Statements will bring a new and challenging message?
For now I like to remember the example of a municipality to another is not registered nor certified ISO 14001 and EMAS, sensitive to the protection of the territory. It 's the City of Cassinetta Lugagnano , which won the National Association
virtuous community, in the category 'land management', for having approved a Municipal Structural Plan at zero growth, and that experience is an absolute first of its kind in Italy (for more details see also http:// www.comunivirtuosi.org ). If you know of other situations "virtuous" or otherwise alert and "measured", tell. Thanks
0 comments:
Post a Comment